View Mobile Site

Home › OPINION › Letters to the Editor › Alternatives to horn blowing
Text Size: Smaller Larger Normal

Alternatives to horn blowing
POSTED August 23, 2011 9:25 p.m.

Dear Editor:

I believe wherever there are cross arms at railroad crossings and the weather and view are clear, blowing the train’s horn is totally unnecessary.

When the train horn is blown, the only message is don’t go around the cross arms because a train is coming. I feel there should be surveillance cameras placed on both arms so when a vehicle does go around the cross arms and gets hit by a train there is proof. There should be a law that states anyone bypassing the cross arms loses all rights to suing the owners of the tracks or train.

Even if a vehicle is not hit, the engineer should report these infractions to local law enforcement agencies. Each crossing should be given a number to make it easy to report such as crossing 133W (westbound).

Perhaps ordinary people could report anyone bypassing cross arms by giving the date, crossing number, time of day and the surveillance cameras could provide the license number. The first person reporting the infraction could receive 20 percent of the fine.

If the engineer sees a cross arm up in the air or there is foggy weather at a gated crossing, he should blow his horn.

Our state legislators should do something about this.

— Wendell Martin
Aug. 23, 2011 09:25p.m. EDT Alternatives to horn blowing Turlock Journal

Dear Editor:

I believe wherever there are cross arms at railroad crossings and the weather and view are clear, blowing the train’s horn is totally unnecessary.

When the train horn is blown, the only message is don’t go around the cross arms because a train is coming. I feel there should be surveillance cameras placed on both arms so when a vehicle does go around the cross arms and gets hit by a train there is proof. There should be a law that states anyone bypassing the cross arms loses all rights to suing the owners of the tracks or train.

Even if a vehicle is not hit, the engineer should report these infractions to local law enforcement agencies. Each crossing should be given a number to make it easy to report such as crossing 133W (westbound).

Perhaps ordinary people could report anyone bypassing cross arms by giving the date, crossing number, time of day and the surveillance cameras could provide the license number. The first person reporting the infraction could receive 20 percent of the fine.

If the engineer sees a cross arm up in the air or there is foggy weather at a gated crossing, he should blow his horn.

Our state legislators should do something about this.

— Wendell Martin

Copyright 2011 MorrisMultimedia . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed

Enter a Comment:

You must be logged in to post comments.
http://www.turlockjournal.com/ encourages readers to interact with one another. We will not edit your comments, but we reserve the right to delete any inappropriate responses.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, contact our editor.

The comments below are from readers of http://www.turlockjournal.com/ and do not necessarily represent the views of The Newspaper or Morris Multimedia.

Share on Facebook Bookmark and Share
1 comment
tlkca: 1 year, 6 months ago

You must be joking! There are numerous people who would probably be hit IF they no longer blew the train whistle.
I lived on the West side of town just a few blocks away from the rail road tracks for 40 plus years and had and still have NO objections to the train whistle!




Please wait ...