Caution ahead for high speed rail
Letters To the Editor:
For a passenger train system that is years away from being completed, California High Speed Rail sure is carrying lots of baggage. We can thank its long history of disjointed planning for the many budgetary and infrastructural setbacks.
Agricultural, municipal and environmental groups are up in arms over high speed rail route issues that adversely affect water, crops, livestock, wildlife and scenic plant life. From infrastructure to commerce, jobs and longevity of living things; there are many reasons why Congressman Jeff Denham requires a high speed rail plan, and prioritizes overall rail system needs while demanding fact-based answers.
Neither California High Speed Rail Authority nor Amtrak’s High Speed Rail system plans meet the congressman’s established criteria that emphasize safety, quality and affordability. Any effort by the California High Speed Rail Authority and Amtrak to combine their respective budgets (or increase purchasing power for train sets) would likely be a failed effort. This is because their respective regions would require separate and exorbitantly expensive train designs.
Nevertheless, if Denham favors $6 billion in northeast corridor infrastructure improvements, it could help the California High Speed Rail Authority and Amtrak to connect, combine their respective budgets, and see if a high speed savings miracle occurs!