By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
City Council to deal with RDA closure
Placeholder Image

On Dec. 28, the California Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional a measure which would have allowed redevelopment agencies statewide to remain intact by making annual payments to the state, forcing a statewide shutdown of redevelopment agencies.

On Tuesday, the Turlock City Council will react to the California Supreme Court's decision by considering a resolution which would ultimately wind down the Turlock Redevelopment Agency, pay off existing debts, complete current projects, and see an end to redevelopment.

The proposed resolution would declare the City of Turlock serve as the successor agency for the Turlock RDA. The agency board would consist of one City Council member, one employee of the existing RDA, one Turlock Unified School District representative, one County Office of Education representative, one Yosemite Community College District representative, and two Board of Supervisors representatives, per state law.

By declaring Turlock shall serve as a successor agency, the city will receive 5 percent of the previously allocated tax increment for administrative purposes this year, and 3 percent for each year until all RDA obligations are paid off.

That funding will help ease the reduction in RDA funding, $500,000 of which is currently allocated to administrative, fixed, and employee costs annually. The agency currently funds all or part of seven positions, plus a portion of administrative funding for six departments.

But with the elimination of redevelopment, Turlock will be unable to implement any future redevelopment projects, as no new funding will be allotted to the city. Before the State Supreme Court's action, Turlock had the option of making a $2.46 million one-time payment and a further $615,000 per year to retain its redevelopment agency – and ongoing funding.

The future of some other activities funded by Turlock's RDA – code enforcement, graffiti abatement, and development of the city’s industrial park – remains uncertain.

 

On Tuesday, the Turlock City Council is also expected to:

Request that CalTrans post signs referring to Downtown Turlock near the West Main Street exits on Highway 99.Authorize a 4.5 percent base pay equity adjustment for all city employees, from Nov. 16, 2011 through June 15. The additional pay is requested as the City of Turlock came in $1.6 million under budget in 2010-2011, leading the city to give back some of the excess to employees who previously agreed to accept lower salaries in a budget balancing maneuver.Recognize the 100th anniversary of Thorsen's Plumbing, Solar, Heat & Air, Turlock's longest continuously owned and operated business.Recognize the retirement of Marc St. Pierre, fire battalion chief, and Floyd Martin, fire engineer.Hear a presentation on the Stanislaus Sustainable Communities Strategy, by which the county will look to meet the requirements of SB375.Receive the 2011 Northern San Joaquin Section Plant of the Year Award, given to Turlock's wastewater treatment plant.Hear staff updates on leaving Auto Mall Drive open at night, and on existing board, commission, and committee vacancies.Accept a plan for the expenditure of nearly $3 million in federal transportation funds on Turlock's Bus Line Service of Turlock. The plan calls for operating assistance, busses, construction of the new Del's Lane Transit Hub, preventative maintenance, and bus support equipment.Accept the finalized Housing Element, a document which explains how Turlock will meet housing needs through 2014. The document was first approved in 2010, but state approval was delayed until December 2011 due to concerns with the city's plan to address homelessness. That plan was updated in July 2011, when the city created a new zoning area allowing for the construction of homeless shelters.Update the city's building code to meet new state standards. Among the new standards are the addition of cost recovery fees for a new, statewide green building code, and fees for denied appeals from the Building Appeals Board. Additionally, the updated code alters standards which determine when sprinklers are required in residential buildings. Agree to participate in an out-of-court settlement between Bank of America and 28 state Attorneys General, regarding the marketing of municipal bond derivatives between 1998 and 2003. Turlock's share of the $62.5 million settlement is $7,974.80.Conduct a regularly scheduled, annual performance evaluation of City Manager Roy Wasden.

 

The Turlock City Council will meet at 7 p.m. on Tuesday in the Yosemite Room of Turlock City Hall, 156 S. Broadway.

To contact Alex Cantatore, e-mail acantatore@turlockjournal.com or call 634-9141 ext. 2005.

Modesto Irrigation District director accused of water theft, board will investigate
MID
Modesto Irrigation District Director Larry Byrd (left) attends a regular board meeting on Aug. 12 (GARTH STAPLEY/The Modesto Focus).

By GARTH STAPLEY

CV Journalism Collaborative

The Modesto Irrigation District will look into accusations that one of its top elected leaders has stolen water, the lifeblood of the public utility.

Speculation that longtime Director Larry Byrd has used MID water to nourish almond trees outside district boundaries near La Grange has spilled into the agency’s boardroom in two recent meetings, including last week.

MID Board President Robert Frobose, whose position gives him authority to commission investigations, cited hopes of shoring up public trust in confirming that the accusation is being taken seriously.

“I expect the district will be conducting a thorough and independent examination of the allegations forthwith,” Frobose said Sept. 12 in response to a Modesto Focus inquiry. “We deeply care about ensuring public trust is maintained along with responsible water management, while also ensuring this is looked at independently and fairly.”

Byrd, a board director since 2011, did not respond to The Modesto Focus’ questions about the allegations or an investigation.

MID has vast impact on Valley life. The district provided farmwater to 2,300 growers with 66,000 acres, and also provides electricity to 133,000 customer accounts in Modesto, Salida, Waterford and Mountain House and parts of Ripon, Escalon, Oakdale, and Riverbank. About half of Modesto’s tap water comes from treated MID river water.

On Sept. 9, members of the audience publicly urged Byrd to address the accusations. Byrd stayed silent, as he did July 8 when an audience member, citing “satellite imaging” evidence, first raised the suspicion.

Since then, Byrd has denied wrongdoing in a series of six articles of the Valley Citizen online publication. They include interviews with a former longtime employee of Byrd casting doubt on Byrd’s version of the story.

Valley Citizen writer Eric Caine says Byrd, who also farms in the Waterford area, and his partners planted 500 acres of almond trees in 2015 on land where Byrd previously ran cattle near La Grange. 

 

Water theft allegations leave a stain on Modesto Irrigation District

Caine quoted two MID officials – Frobose and former board director Nick Blom – repeating the common perception that Byrd’s entire La Grange orchard was entitled to MID water. But more than 100 acres reportedly are outside district boundaries, the Valley Citizen says.

The allegations are “a blemish on MID,” said Bill Lyons, noting his own nine years on the board (1984 to 1993) during the public comment portion of the Sept. 9 board meeting. “There is an opportunity for you, Larry, to clear the record, and I urge you to do so.”

Anthony Ratto also rose to speak from the audience at the same meeting, suggesting that Byrd’s ardent support two years ago for selling surplus MID water to east Stanislaus growers outside district boundaries at a below-market price makes more sense in light of the recent allegations. When such sales were hotly debated in 2023, many assumed Byrd was advocating for his neighbors; now it seems it was for “personal benefit,” Ratto said.

Faced with the sober claims, the MID board has little choice but to investigate one of their own, said Ripon attorney Stacy Henderson. 

She noted MID’s history of holding others accountable when suspected of similar wrongdoing. 

“I don’t see any reason to take any different approach just because it’s a (board) director accused of misusing the district’s water,” she said.

Henderson for years has represented the interests of growers on the west end of MID boundaries in a long-running feud with those on the east, whose pumping of groundwater to sustain millions of nut trees is under scrutiny.

 

East Stanislaus aquifer in danger from overpumping

In 2023, east-side growers pumped a whopping 70,000 more acre-feet of groundwater than seeped into its underground aquifer, records show. By comparison, that’s about the same total amount pumped from wells each year, on average, by the cities of Modesto, Oakdale, Riverbank and Waterford plus MID and the Oakdale Irrigation District combined, according to west side attorneys. The deficit dropped a bit in 2024, to 58,500 acre-feet.

When they have surplus, both OID and MID have offered help to east-side growers in the form of surface water from the Stanislaus and Tuolumne rivers, respectively, and some have taken OID water at $200 per acre-foot. But none has signed up for MID water offered at the same price, insisting – with Byrd leading the charge – that it be lowered to $60 an acre-foot, to encourage participation.

No other portion of the Modesto subbasin, stretching across much of Stanislaus County, is in danger of depleting the aquifer under it. But the entire area could face consequences for the crisis on the east end when new state groundwater regulations under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act kick in, in early 2027.

The region’s latest plan to address groundwater is being developed, with public hearings hosted by the Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association coming in the fall and a vote expected in January. Outcomes are likely to include pumping restrictions and may feature intrusion by state water officials.

Some observers say the entire area should participate in solving the problem on the east, citing agriculture as the backbone industry of the Stanislaus economy.

Others contend that farming is a business venture like any other, subject to risk. Speculators paid comparatively little for east-side property, much of it former low-value grazing land with no rights to surface water, and turned it into orchards, sometimes without a reliable water source. Why, west-side interests say, should people across the county bail out what they consider unwise investments in the east?

Heavy hitters in east v. west Stanislaus water debate

All three Sept. 9 speakers – Henderson, Ratto and Lyons – represent the west; the latter is a former state agriculture secretary. Advocates for the east include former Congressman John Duarte and his wife, Alexandra, an announced candidate for a state Senate seat in next year’s election.

The west has tried to link eastern interests to Stanislaus County Supervisor Terry Withrow, a certified public accountant whose clients include people doing business with Byrd. Withrow has said he has no financial interest in the water feud, but to help facilitate resolution, he convened a rare meeting of the warring parties in August. Many left with increased understanding but no consensus, several told The Modesto Focus.

MID officials in 2015 accused six customers of misusing water, fined them and cut off their irrigation water, but soon after reinstated three of them and canceled their penalties. 

A 2019 court ruling in the case of Nichols v. MID made clear that using district water outside the district is unlawful, even if the land in question is next to the district.

The MID board is no stranger to conflict. Just last month, the board censured board director Janice Keating for mistreating staff, and she lost a gender discrimination lawsuit last year against Frobose. Past boards reprimanded their own and defended lawsuits against claims of discrimination and retaliation.

— Garth Stapley is the accountability reporter for The Modesto Focus, a project of the nonprofit Central Valley Journalism Collaborative. Contact Stapley at garth@cvlocaljournalism.org.