By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
DeHart seeks City Council reelection in District 3
Kiehl joins race for District 1 seat
election logo

Turlock City Council member Bill DeHart said he has a “real intense desire to continue to serve” the residents of Turlock and will be seeking a third term in November.

DeHart was elected to the Council in November 2010, and then beat out fellow incumbent Forrest White and challengers Sergio Alvarado and Donald Babadalir in the 2014 citywide election. This will be the first time residents of District 3 will elect their own representative.

“Serving the people of Turlock, it’s been very gratifying — addressing issues, answering questions, solving problems,” he said.

Bill Dehart
Turlock City Council member Bill DeHart is seeking a third term in November. - photo by Contributed

DeHart said while there’s “a lot of work in our work plan” left to do, there has been some key progress on projects that the City is just “now seeing come to fruition — the recycled water project, drinking water through SRWA [Stanislaus Regional Water Authority], roads projects.”

“Through SB1 and other initiatives, we finally have funding sources where we can fix our roads and improve transportation,” said DeHart.

He said it’s been frustrating to hear people’s complaints about Turlock’s roadways — and experience them himself — while waiting for funding to come through.

“Genuine and real dollars are now coming, it’s exciting get to make some real changes,” he said.

DeHart said that over his tenure on the Council, he’s seen a revitalization of Turlock’s downtown.

“Downtown vacancy rate is now down to 1 to 2 percent. We’ve created an atmosphere where people feel safe going downtown,” he said.

He also mentioned development on Countryside Drive and Monte Vista Avenue as “significant” changes to Turlock’s overall economy.

Although he’s excited to see recent transportation and development projects get underway, DeHart said he’s also aware of the City’s challenges.

When it comes to homelessness, DeHart said it’s a statewide issue and his role on the League of California Cities’ Community Services Policy Committee will bring ideas to the table in Turlock.

“I think we’ve got a funding issue. We need some support from the state and county to address these issues,” DeHart said about homelessness.

Another issue that DeHart has been working on is cannabis. He and Council member Gil Esquer are on an ad hoc committee seeking more information on whether it would be beneficial for the City of Turlock to change its policy currently banning cannabis sales and commercial grow operations.

“We’ve made some visitations around the area and so the funding of government through that source is something we’re looking at very intently. It’s all around us, just not in Turlock. We’ve kind of set our selves up as an island, that concerns me,” he said.

When it comes to the recent strife seen on the Council dais, DeHart said that “playing in the sandbox is never easy.”

“We can disagree but not be disagreeable… I think we’re human, too. We give each other the freedom to express those opposing views because that’s where we come up with that cohesive decision in setting policy. We’ve fallen from that, but I think we need to strive to be better,” he said.

DeHart said he is seeking input from community members and is available by email at wwdhart@gmail.com.

Recently returned Turlock native Andrew Nosrati is challenging DeHart for the District 3 seat.

Another candidate has announced his intentions of seeking the Turlock City Council District 1 seat.

Alex Kiehl joins Logan Sisco and former Council member White in seeking the District 1 seat in November.

Kiehl, a lifelong resident of Turlock, said he is running for a seat on the City Council on a public safety platform.

Alex Kiehl
Alex Kiehl is seeking the District 1 seat in November. - photo by Contributed

“It is imperative that our peace officers and firefighting personnel have the resources they need at all times to protect the community which we love so dearly. We must also make certain that they can earn a living wage here in Turlock. Our community cannot afford to continue seeing these brave and talented men and women seek employment elsewhere,” Kiehl said in a statement announcing his candidacy.

Kiehl said Turlock’s biggest challenges are the crime and homelessness rates.

He is also opposed to Turlock’s ban on cannabis.

“I believe that cannabis should be taxed and regulated by all municipalities in California. That being said, however, the ultimate decision should be made by the voters and not the City Council.”

Kiehl made a number of campaign promises. If elected, he will:

  • Contribute 10 percent of his monthly stipend to various charities and nonprofits around Turlock;
  • Not seek more than two terms of office on the City Council;
  • Hold annual town hall meetings with constituents;
  • Never vote in favor of placing a tax increase measure on the local ballot, unless funds are to only be used for public safety purposes.

Kiehl unsuccessfully ran against incumbent Diana Lewis in 2016 for the Turlock City Treasurer position.

He graduated from California State University, Stanislaus in 2012 with a degree in criminal justice. In 2014, he earned a paralegal certificate from the Center for Legal Studies, based in Golden, Colorado. From 2001 to 2016, he was employed as a bookkeeper and tax preparer at his family’s accounting practice in downtown Turlock. He served on the Stanislaus County Civil Grand Jury in 2012-13.

To contact Kiehl, email nuneskiehl@yahoo.com or mail him a letter to P.O. Box 1421 Main St., Turlock, CA 95380.

The candidate nomination period for the Nov. 6 election officially begins at 8 a.m. July 16 and ends at 5 p.m. Aug. 10.  If an incumbent for one of the offices being voted upon does not file nomination papers by Aug. 10, the nomination period for that office will be extended to 5 p.m. Aug. 15. City Council candidates must be a registered voter in the district of which they reside and are seeking to represent at the time nomination papers are issued. Upon assuming office, candidates must be U.S. citizens and reside in the Council District from which he or she was elected. For more information regarding the nomination period or to schedule an appointment to pull nomination papers and other election-related materials, contact the Office of the Turlock City Clerk at 668-5540.

 

Modesto Irrigation District director accused of water theft, board will investigate
MID
Modesto Irrigation District Director Larry Byrd (left) attends a regular board meeting on Aug. 12 (GARTH STAPLEY/The Modesto Focus).

By GARTH STAPLEY

CV Journalism Collaborative

The Modesto Irrigation District will look into accusations that one of its top elected leaders has stolen water, the lifeblood of the public utility.

Speculation that longtime Director Larry Byrd has used MID water to nourish almond trees outside district boundaries near La Grange has spilled into the agency’s boardroom in two recent meetings, including last week.

MID Board President Robert Frobose, whose position gives him authority to commission investigations, cited hopes of shoring up public trust in confirming that the accusation is being taken seriously.

“I expect the district will be conducting a thorough and independent examination of the allegations forthwith,” Frobose said Sept. 12 in response to a Modesto Focus inquiry. “We deeply care about ensuring public trust is maintained along with responsible water management, while also ensuring this is looked at independently and fairly.”

Byrd, a board director since 2011, did not respond to The Modesto Focus’ questions about the allegations or an investigation.

MID has vast impact on Valley life. The district provided farmwater to 2,300 growers with 66,000 acres, and also provides electricity to 133,000 customer accounts in Modesto, Salida, Waterford and Mountain House and parts of Ripon, Escalon, Oakdale, and Riverbank. About half of Modesto’s tap water comes from treated MID river water.

On Sept. 9, members of the audience publicly urged Byrd to address the accusations. Byrd stayed silent, as he did July 8 when an audience member, citing “satellite imaging” evidence, first raised the suspicion.

Since then, Byrd has denied wrongdoing in a series of six articles of the Valley Citizen online publication. They include interviews with a former longtime employee of Byrd casting doubt on Byrd’s version of the story.

Valley Citizen writer Eric Caine says Byrd, who also farms in the Waterford area, and his partners planted 500 acres of almond trees in 2015 on land where Byrd previously ran cattle near La Grange. 

 

Water theft allegations leave a stain on Modesto Irrigation District

Caine quoted two MID officials – Frobose and former board director Nick Blom – repeating the common perception that Byrd’s entire La Grange orchard was entitled to MID water. But more than 100 acres reportedly are outside district boundaries, the Valley Citizen says.

The allegations are “a blemish on MID,” said Bill Lyons, noting his own nine years on the board (1984 to 1993) during the public comment portion of the Sept. 9 board meeting. “There is an opportunity for you, Larry, to clear the record, and I urge you to do so.”

Anthony Ratto also rose to speak from the audience at the same meeting, suggesting that Byrd’s ardent support two years ago for selling surplus MID water to east Stanislaus growers outside district boundaries at a below-market price makes more sense in light of the recent allegations. When such sales were hotly debated in 2023, many assumed Byrd was advocating for his neighbors; now it seems it was for “personal benefit,” Ratto said.

Faced with the sober claims, the MID board has little choice but to investigate one of their own, said Ripon attorney Stacy Henderson. 

She noted MID’s history of holding others accountable when suspected of similar wrongdoing. 

“I don’t see any reason to take any different approach just because it’s a (board) director accused of misusing the district’s water,” she said.

Henderson for years has represented the interests of growers on the west end of MID boundaries in a long-running feud with those on the east, whose pumping of groundwater to sustain millions of nut trees is under scrutiny.

 

East Stanislaus aquifer in danger from overpumping

In 2023, east-side growers pumped a whopping 70,000 more acre-feet of groundwater than seeped into its underground aquifer, records show. By comparison, that’s about the same total amount pumped from wells each year, on average, by the cities of Modesto, Oakdale, Riverbank and Waterford plus MID and the Oakdale Irrigation District combined, according to west side attorneys. The deficit dropped a bit in 2024, to 58,500 acre-feet.

When they have surplus, both OID and MID have offered help to east-side growers in the form of surface water from the Stanislaus and Tuolumne rivers, respectively, and some have taken OID water at $200 per acre-foot. But none has signed up for MID water offered at the same price, insisting – with Byrd leading the charge – that it be lowered to $60 an acre-foot, to encourage participation.

No other portion of the Modesto subbasin, stretching across much of Stanislaus County, is in danger of depleting the aquifer under it. But the entire area could face consequences for the crisis on the east end when new state groundwater regulations under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act kick in, in early 2027.

The region’s latest plan to address groundwater is being developed, with public hearings hosted by the Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association coming in the fall and a vote expected in January. Outcomes are likely to include pumping restrictions and may feature intrusion by state water officials.

Some observers say the entire area should participate in solving the problem on the east, citing agriculture as the backbone industry of the Stanislaus economy.

Others contend that farming is a business venture like any other, subject to risk. Speculators paid comparatively little for east-side property, much of it former low-value grazing land with no rights to surface water, and turned it into orchards, sometimes without a reliable water source. Why, west-side interests say, should people across the county bail out what they consider unwise investments in the east?

Heavy hitters in east v. west Stanislaus water debate

All three Sept. 9 speakers – Henderson, Ratto and Lyons – represent the west; the latter is a former state agriculture secretary. Advocates for the east include former Congressman John Duarte and his wife, Alexandra, an announced candidate for a state Senate seat in next year’s election.

The west has tried to link eastern interests to Stanislaus County Supervisor Terry Withrow, a certified public accountant whose clients include people doing business with Byrd. Withrow has said he has no financial interest in the water feud, but to help facilitate resolution, he convened a rare meeting of the warring parties in August. Many left with increased understanding but no consensus, several told The Modesto Focus.

MID officials in 2015 accused six customers of misusing water, fined them and cut off their irrigation water, but soon after reinstated three of them and canceled their penalties. 

A 2019 court ruling in the case of Nichols v. MID made clear that using district water outside the district is unlawful, even if the land in question is next to the district.

The MID board is no stranger to conflict. Just last month, the board censured board director Janice Keating for mistreating staff, and she lost a gender discrimination lawsuit last year against Frobose. Past boards reprimanded their own and defended lawsuits against claims of discrimination and retaliation.

— Garth Stapley is the accountability reporter for The Modesto Focus, a project of the nonprofit Central Valley Journalism Collaborative. Contact Stapley at garth@cvlocaljournalism.org.