By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Karen Ross highlights state's agricultural priorities
Karen Ross
CDFA Secretary Karen Ross poses for a picture with FFA students during Ag Day 2025 at the Capitol (Photo contributed).

STAFF REPORTS

AgAlert

Karen Ross is secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture, a position she has held since 2011, with reappointment by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2019. She has dedicated her life to advancing agriculture, sustainability, nutrition and agricultural education while maintaining essential programs to safeguard agriculture, including pest and disease prevention. Secretary Ross responded to questions during an interview with the California Farm Bureau’s Ag Alert. The below conversation was edited for length and clarity.

What are your top priorities at CDFA? Our priorities include the fundamental services we provide, especially pest and disease prevention, food safety and standards inspections. These are critical areas where we must maintain strong funding, scientific expertise and modern laboratory diagnostics. As costs go up, it puts additional stress on the operating budget for farmers and ranchers, so we are very committed to doing the work that we do for farmers in the most cost-effective way possible. One of my biggest priorities is early collaboration with sister agencies. By bringing in our department’s scientific and agronomic expertise early on, we can suggest alternative, science-based approaches to achieving environmental goals. 

What are some of the biggest challenges and opportunities facing California agriculture? Even in these challenging and uncertain times, we are making sure that we continue to build export markets for our specialty crops and for dairy. We are equally focused on strengthening our local food systems. Our $85 million investment in farm-to-school programs during the past four years has reached almost 3 million children. In terms of the next generation of agriculture, we want to make sure that we can equip our talented existing workforce with the skills to be a part of that transition to more technology and automation in the future. 

What issues keep you up at night when you think about California agriculture? The extreme events and the disruption in supply chains, and also the water situation. I, like the governor, would love to see the breaking of the ground on Sites Reservoir but also to accelerate more groundwater recharge for our water security. I’m concerned about the issues that many farmers worry about: How do I maintain profitability? It is crucial that we understand where we can help provide relief or more efficient, effective ways of doing things. It’s hugely important for our landscape and our climate goals to keep people on the land and for families in rural communities to have a thriving agricultural sector. 

What is the status of the CDFA 2025-26 budget? We are grateful that the governor’s May Revise proposal includes a critical investment in updating our emergency animal disease and public health program to ensure more rapid response and effective biosecurity prevention measures to outbreaks like avian influenza. We have taken great care to minimize the impact of the reductions we have taken to ensure core functions are maintained. We are evaluating the best approach for some remaining unallocated cuts and will be engaging with stakeholders in the process. 

With a new administration in Washington, D.C., how is CDFA navigating changes in federal policy? For me, agriculture has never been about partisan politics. We’re all here to serve farmers and ranchers and make sure that the American people have healthy, nutritious food. I’m very enthused about the emphasis on health and nutrition. As for opportunities, U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins is very focused on farmer and rancher profitability, and we want to make sure that specialty crops are high on her radar screen. We’re very hopeful that she will visit California soon.

How is CDFA helping producers be more sustainable? I’m excited about the work we’re doing positioning farmers as part of the solution to achieving climate resiliency on farms in what we call climate-smart programs, whether it is healthy soils, water-use efficiency or partnering with our dairy farmers to reduce methane emissions with dairy digesters. We’re providing seamless delivery of information about grants and technical assistance to help more farmers participate, including in programs such as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program. 

What do you want to accomplish before the end of this administration? I want to make sure that new or well established programs will continue long after I was here. Those programs include what we did to create alternatives to the nutrient management challenges and our work with the dairy sector and state and federal agencies to get dairy digester technology deployed. I’m also really hopeful we can get a strong climate resiliency strategy. We’ll have that out for comment shortly to really show the roadmap of continued investment. 

What is the most rewarding part of your job? It is the people—the people in agriculture and what I see in my own staff—dedicated people who are passionate about agriculture. The best day is any day I get to meet the youth—FFA, 4-H and the young kids discovering Ag in the Classroom, and the teachers who support them. I feel very lucky to be able to do this job with the people that I work with and I work for.

— Courtesy of the California Farm Bureau. 

Modesto Irrigation District director accused of water theft, board will investigate
MID
Modesto Irrigation District Director Larry Byrd (left) attends a regular board meeting on Aug. 12 (GARTH STAPLEY/The Modesto Focus).

By GARTH STAPLEY

CV Journalism Collaborative

The Modesto Irrigation District will look into accusations that one of its top elected leaders has stolen water, the lifeblood of the public utility.

Speculation that longtime Director Larry Byrd has used MID water to nourish almond trees outside district boundaries near La Grange has spilled into the agency’s boardroom in two recent meetings, including last week.

MID Board President Robert Frobose, whose position gives him authority to commission investigations, cited hopes of shoring up public trust in confirming that the accusation is being taken seriously.

“I expect the district will be conducting a thorough and independent examination of the allegations forthwith,” Frobose said Sept. 12 in response to a Modesto Focus inquiry. “We deeply care about ensuring public trust is maintained along with responsible water management, while also ensuring this is looked at independently and fairly.”

Byrd, a board director since 2011, did not respond to The Modesto Focus’ questions about the allegations or an investigation.

MID has vast impact on Valley life. The district provided farmwater to 2,300 growers with 66,000 acres, and also provides electricity to 133,000 customer accounts in Modesto, Salida, Waterford and Mountain House and parts of Ripon, Escalon, Oakdale, and Riverbank. About half of Modesto’s tap water comes from treated MID river water.

On Sept. 9, members of the audience publicly urged Byrd to address the accusations. Byrd stayed silent, as he did July 8 when an audience member, citing “satellite imaging” evidence, first raised the suspicion.

Since then, Byrd has denied wrongdoing in a series of six articles of the Valley Citizen online publication. They include interviews with a former longtime employee of Byrd casting doubt on Byrd’s version of the story.

Valley Citizen writer Eric Caine says Byrd, who also farms in the Waterford area, and his partners planted 500 acres of almond trees in 2015 on land where Byrd previously ran cattle near La Grange. 

 

Water theft allegations leave a stain on Modesto Irrigation District

Caine quoted two MID officials – Frobose and former board director Nick Blom – repeating the common perception that Byrd’s entire La Grange orchard was entitled to MID water. But more than 100 acres reportedly are outside district boundaries, the Valley Citizen says.

The allegations are “a blemish on MID,” said Bill Lyons, noting his own nine years on the board (1984 to 1993) during the public comment portion of the Sept. 9 board meeting. “There is an opportunity for you, Larry, to clear the record, and I urge you to do so.”

Anthony Ratto also rose to speak from the audience at the same meeting, suggesting that Byrd’s ardent support two years ago for selling surplus MID water to east Stanislaus growers outside district boundaries at a below-market price makes more sense in light of the recent allegations. When such sales were hotly debated in 2023, many assumed Byrd was advocating for his neighbors; now it seems it was for “personal benefit,” Ratto said.

Faced with the sober claims, the MID board has little choice but to investigate one of their own, said Ripon attorney Stacy Henderson. 

She noted MID’s history of holding others accountable when suspected of similar wrongdoing. 

“I don’t see any reason to take any different approach just because it’s a (board) director accused of misusing the district’s water,” she said.

Henderson for years has represented the interests of growers on the west end of MID boundaries in a long-running feud with those on the east, whose pumping of groundwater to sustain millions of nut trees is under scrutiny.

 

East Stanislaus aquifer in danger from overpumping

In 2023, east-side growers pumped a whopping 70,000 more acre-feet of groundwater than seeped into its underground aquifer, records show. By comparison, that’s about the same total amount pumped from wells each year, on average, by the cities of Modesto, Oakdale, Riverbank and Waterford plus MID and the Oakdale Irrigation District combined, according to west side attorneys. The deficit dropped a bit in 2024, to 58,500 acre-feet.

When they have surplus, both OID and MID have offered help to east-side growers in the form of surface water from the Stanislaus and Tuolumne rivers, respectively, and some have taken OID water at $200 per acre-foot. But none has signed up for MID water offered at the same price, insisting – with Byrd leading the charge – that it be lowered to $60 an acre-foot, to encourage participation.

No other portion of the Modesto subbasin, stretching across much of Stanislaus County, is in danger of depleting the aquifer under it. But the entire area could face consequences for the crisis on the east end when new state groundwater regulations under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act kick in, in early 2027.

The region’s latest plan to address groundwater is being developed, with public hearings hosted by the Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association coming in the fall and a vote expected in January. Outcomes are likely to include pumping restrictions and may feature intrusion by state water officials.

Some observers say the entire area should participate in solving the problem on the east, citing agriculture as the backbone industry of the Stanislaus economy.

Others contend that farming is a business venture like any other, subject to risk. Speculators paid comparatively little for east-side property, much of it former low-value grazing land with no rights to surface water, and turned it into orchards, sometimes without a reliable water source. Why, west-side interests say, should people across the county bail out what they consider unwise investments in the east?

Heavy hitters in east v. west Stanislaus water debate

All three Sept. 9 speakers – Henderson, Ratto and Lyons – represent the west; the latter is a former state agriculture secretary. Advocates for the east include former Congressman John Duarte and his wife, Alexandra, an announced candidate for a state Senate seat in next year’s election.

The west has tried to link eastern interests to Stanislaus County Supervisor Terry Withrow, a certified public accountant whose clients include people doing business with Byrd. Withrow has said he has no financial interest in the water feud, but to help facilitate resolution, he convened a rare meeting of the warring parties in August. Many left with increased understanding but no consensus, several told The Modesto Focus.

MID officials in 2015 accused six customers of misusing water, fined them and cut off their irrigation water, but soon after reinstated three of them and canceled their penalties. 

A 2019 court ruling in the case of Nichols v. MID made clear that using district water outside the district is unlawful, even if the land in question is next to the district.

The MID board is no stranger to conflict. Just last month, the board censured board director Janice Keating for mistreating staff, and she lost a gender discrimination lawsuit last year against Frobose. Past boards reprimanded their own and defended lawsuits against claims of discrimination and retaliation.

— Garth Stapley is the accountability reporter for The Modesto Focus, a project of the nonprofit Central Valley Journalism Collaborative. Contact Stapley at garth@cvlocaljournalism.org.